Blog

New York Times Interview

There’s something very satisfying about waking up in the morning to find you’ve been featured in a New York Times article. Writer, consultant and workplace expert, Alexandra Levit spoke with me earlier this summer about some of the ways increasingly emotionally aware technology will change our work environment.

NYT-Preoccupations

Given the preponderance of vanishing job doom-and-gloom, we focused on the idea that more and more we’re going to see “co-work” situations in which AIs and robots work alongside people to help enhance capabilities and productivity. Such scenarios will only benefit from these technologies’ growing ability to be emotionally sensitive to their human co-workers. Since this inevitably contributes to the growth of machine intelligence, it’s a win-win for both our tribes.

“Heart of the Machine” coming to a store near you!

I haven’t been writing articles or posting for a good few months, because I’ve been head down completing my new book. Heart of the Machine is now complete and going through final edits with my publisher, Skyhorse Publishing, one of the fastest growing independent publishers in the country.

Heart of the Machine cover 600x900

Toys that change based on children’s emotional responses. Smart homes and digital assistants that sense what kind of day you had and interact with you accordingly. Devices that can artificially generate a specific feeling for you. Perhaps even the foundations for true machine consciousness. Heart of the Machine: Our Future in a World of Artificial Emotional Intelligence explores the coming era of affective computing, social robotics and other emotionally-aware technologies. These systems are destined to transform our world and our lives over the next few decades. Already, the field is forecast to grow from a U.S. market of $9.35 billion in 2015 to $42.51 billion by 2020. That’s a heck of a growth rate for a market that virtually didn’t exist a decade ago!

Heart of the Machine is being released in March 2017 and is now available for pre-order at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. For other outlets, ask your friendly neighborhood bookstore when they plan to get it on their shelves. To learn more about this incredible future, please visit this page.

 

The Future Era of Space Mining

Astronaut on asteroid

An astronaut secures the “bag” holding a huge space rock in an illustration of NASA’s proposed Asteroid Redirect Mission
Credit: NASA

The new era of space mining is the topic of my latest article for Scientific American. The recent passage of the Space Act of 2015 by Congress will finally eliminate a lot of uncertainty for this nascent industry, assuming President Obama signs it into law. Given the enormous cost of lifting materials and supplies into orbit and beyond, the ability to draw from off-planet resources is critical for the continuing development of space exploration and colonization. As Eric Anderson, co-founder and co-chairman of Planetary Resources stated following Congressional passage of the Act:

“Many years from now, we will view this pivotal moment in time as a major step toward humanity becoming a multi-planetary species. This legislation establishes the same supportive framework that created the great economies of history, and it will foster the sustained development of space.”

Given the continuing progress being made by the developing commercial space industry, including yesterday’s first successful VTOL (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) by Blue Origin, it seems to me we may be witnessing the start of one of the great transformational periods in human history.


Cybercrime 2025 and Beyond

San Francisco was host to WorldFuture 2015 earlier this month. With around 700 attendees and professional futurists from all over the globe, it remains the world’s oldest and best known futures conference.

On Saturday, the conference’s first full day, I had the opportunity to give my session, “Cybercrime 2025 and Beyond” to a full house and it seemed very well received. I chose to take a little different tack with this talk and explored the development of cybercrime and the search for its solutions as part of the ongoing coevolution between humanity and technology. I ended with a call for building a biologically-inspired cyber-immune system that could protect not only our future digital assets, but potentially our physical infrastructure as well. While there is research being done in this area, there isn’t a focused program for bringing it to fruition. Yet.

Given the growing threat of cybercrime in recent years, it’s no surprise there were several speakers at the conference who addressed the subject. “Future Crimes” author, Marc Goodman opened the morning with an excellent talk that drew from the wide range of topics he covers in his new book. Later in the afternoon, Roey Tzezana, a nanotechnology scientist and futurist from the University of Tel Aviv spoke about his team’s cybercrime forecast model which looks at the threat profiles that are generated when different technologies are combined. Fascinating stuff.

Optocapacitance in Scientific American

Gold nanoparticles

Gold nanoparticles refract light
differently based on on their size
My latest Scientific American article “Optocapacitance Shines New Light on the Brain” explores an exciting new technology, tentatively named optocapacitance. While I’ve been excited about its better-known cousin, optogenetics, for years, I think this has greater potential for therapeutic application and augmentation uses in living human beings. Treatment of macular degeneration and certain other retinal diseases has been one suggested application. It could also offer an effective method for integrating robotic and neural prosthetics with our bodies. Direct connections between various devices and our nervous system could become possible, providing improved sensory feedback and control. As far as affective computing goes, I could see it one day leading to direct communication with our emotions for diagnostic, therapeutic and entertainment purposes.

Is Time Running Out for Smartwatches?

Ask any number of technology analysts, pundits, experts and they’ll tell you that smartwatches are the future. Definitely. The technology is a sure thing. The demand is obvious.

I think it’s a terrible idea – and I always have.

Professional futurists will routinely tell you their work isn’t about making predictions. What we do is much more about exploring a range of potential futures in order to help clients reduce uncertainty in an ever-changing world. Nevertheless, prediction can’t entirely be avoided, which was the case over a year ago when I wrote about why I think smartwatches are a total nonstarter. (“Who Will Watch the Watches?” 8/14/13)

Many of the reasons I gave are now reflected in a recent Business Insider global survey (12/16/14) of over 2,000 readers. Quite simply, most of us just don’t see the point.

Smartwatches have definitely been a case of an idea chasing a market. As I discussed in my post last year, this isn’t just an expense without a purpose, it’s an implementation that’s actually more kludgy and less user-friendly than the technology it’s seeking to supplement. Note, I say supplement because these devices don’t replace or eliminate smartphones, but are instead a further addition to their ever extending ecology. Had this technology been able to entirely replace our phones rather than just be an add-on to them, this might have been another matter. But they’re not phones or email clients, or calendars or contact managers. They’re proxies. Quite simply, smartwatches don’t accomplish what they aspire to do on so many different levels and they never will.

By the time smartwatches work the way we need them to, a range of other technologies will be able to accomplish the same tasks and they’ll do them so much better. While I don’t think this will necessarily be in the form of Google Glass, a range of similar and related interfaces will hit the market in the coming years that should do a much better job integrating with our smartphones and the ways we use them.

The primary point I was making in my earlier post is that every technology comes about in it’s own time or not at all. We can not force it or make it do our bidding beyond a certain point. Ultimately, it’s the current conditions that will determine its fate, deciding whether or not it’s viable.

Let me add that I completely recognize there’s enormous market potential for wearables in the broader sense. This is a nascent field that is only just getting started and which will grow by leaps and bounds during this decade.

To support this, the IEEE 802.15.6 standards committee has set the stage for BANs or Body Area Networks, which will eventually evolve into truly sophisticated wearables – from implantable medical devices, such as programmable insulin pumps to dermal telemetric monitors to smart tattoos. Many of these will create and encourage new markets that will be embraced by consumers because they generate real value and are actually justified.

Unfortunately for smartwatches, they’re likely to remain little more than a market waiting to happen.

Page 2 of 1212345...10...Last »
Like us on Facebook