As I mentioned in a previous post, I began blogging for Psychology Today earlier this month. My latest post there is “Vaccinations: The Intelligent Choice?”, which addresses some of the misconceptions and disinformation surrounding vaccine safety. I decided to write about this because the Washington State legislature is currently attempting to improve vaccination rates by requiring that parents receive better information before being allowed to opt out. (Personally, I think we still need to do more than this, but it’s a step in the right direction.)
Vaccinations are one of the major health achievements of the 20th century. Without them, our citizens would still be ravaged by smallpox, polio, tuberculosis and many other terrible diseases. The decision to try to educate people about the correct risks and benefits of immunization is a wise step in the right direction. Ultimately, the decision to vaccinate becomes not just a question of personal responsibility, but of social responsibility as well.
The post has been selected by Psychology Today for their “Essential Reads: Editor’s Picks” section, which of course, I was very happy to hear.
Addendum: The Seattle Times also recently invited me to be a guest columnist, publishing this article as a “Special to the Times”. (4/10/2011)
The method uses Boolean logic to identify genes having specific relationships and expressions in fractions of a second. Such identification can take years and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars using existing laboratory techniques. Still another benefit of this computational approach is that it can be used to mine existing databases.
This is a perfect example of how the convergence of informational technologies leads to accelerating progress. I would expect Sahoo’s method to radically increase our understanding of many genetic processes. I think this and other computational methods are likely to yield significant discoveries in cancer and aging research during the coming decade.
I’m not the first to say it, but we could certainly stand to have a little more science literacy in this country. In almost all countries, actually. It’s not that everyone needs to understand thermodynamics or be able to calculate a Fibonacci sequence. But as our world and our devices grow in complexity, there are certain basic tools we could all use to make our lives better, safer and more financially secure.
Vaccinations save lives
The recent death of a teenage girl in Coventry, England following her vaccination for human papillomavirus (HPV) is an prime example of this. Immediately following the girl’s death, the media jumped on the story, reporting it in such a way that it created a considerable and unnecessary scare. Though the cause of death was in fact an unrelated tumor, it was days before this information was available to the public. While the young girl’s death was tragic, it would be so much more tragic if hundreds of others lost their lives because they didn’t receive this vaccination. HPV is recognized as the major cause of cervical cancer. Worldwide, there are over half a million new cases of cervical cancer annually resulting in over a quarter million deaths each year. Yet it only takes a small number of serious adverse reactions to sway a large portion of the public because they don’t understand the difference between correlation and causation.
In the US, 24 million doses of HPV vaccine have been given in the last four years with a little under a thousand reports of serious adverse reactions. While some people may see this as a large number of reactions, this amounts to four thousandths of a percent! Given any sufficiently large group, it’s inevitable that something will occur to a small subset – they’ll get a cold or be in an auto accident or win the lottery that day. It’s only correlation. The two events are not linked.
Our minds are structured to want to spot patterns in the world around us. But as the world grows more complex, it’s getting harder to simply intuit those patterns correctly. That’s one reason why people believe in wild conspiracies or that a particular number or color or talisman is lucky for them. But with a little better grounding in science, people could make much better decisions. A little introductory physics will convince you that tailgating is a really bad idea, no matter how advanced your braking system. A quick cost-benefit analysis will show that three seconds of seatbelt-fastening every single car trip beats taking the chance of being one of the twenty thousand that die each year because they didn’t. Exposure to basic probability will show why those trips to the casino are a lousy investment. Knowing something about how polls, surveys and studies are performed will show that the methodology used greatly affects their accuracy and usefulness. (Unless your idea of usefulness is misinformation.)
As technological progress accelerates, it’s only going to become increasingly difficult to navigate through life successfully without these basic tools of science. Without them, many of us will increase our chances of being exposed to preventable health risks, of being needlessly scammed and taken advantage of, and even of dying an unnecessary death. And that’s a tragedy.